Fraudelence Personified :: essays research papers

Fraudulence PersonifiedThe excuser is the crush representation of an aloneegorical character in The Prologue of Geoffrey Chaucers The Canterbury Tales. The Pardoner is the perfect personification of fraudulence. He shows this in terce basic ways his appearance, speech, and actions. If one just glances through the reading of the Pardoner than one will think that he is a good phantasmal man, precisely if one look further into it than he will project out the small double meanings that he is the exact opposite. Chaucer likes to use an allegorical path to add some comedy and sophistication to his writings.The comedy is most heavily use in the Pardoners description than in whatsoever other part of The Canterbury Tales. For example (page 135, seam 712) There was no pardoner of equal grace/ For in his trunk he had a take a breather case. When the scripts no pardoner of equal grace be used you are lead to believe that the Pardoner is a great man, but if you look back in the reading you will find only different things. He is a dirty, immoral man that really does not have much grace. Another example of the sarcastic comedy is (page 135, line 727) In church he was a noble ecclesiast. How well he read a lesson or told a story But best of all he sang an Offertory, For well he knew that when that song was birdcall Hed have to preach and tune his honey-tongue Thats wherefore he sang so merrily and loud. Again the text seems to be saying he is a noble ecclesiast and that he likes to preach the word of God to others. If one looks at it closer one will find out that calling him a noble ecclesiast is a joke and that he only preaches and sings so that he can take the tithes for himself.There are quite a few examples of the Pardoners actions being the personification of fraudulence throughout lines 608-734. For instance (page 135, line 705) Hed stitched a holy relic on his cap/ His billfold come out before him on his lap,/ Brimful of pardon come from Rome all hot. The relic sewed on his hat showed that he thought of himself as a righteous holy man, and that is one thing he was not. The wallet and the pardons was the most disturbing of his acts. Since he was holding his wallet on his lap, it shows that he is very interested in money.