Violence in Mass Media

Violence in Mass MediaThe debates about the frenzy in heap media argon being held for few decades, but there is still no definite answer. The main question is the influence of force-out on hatful through the spate media television, cinema, video mealys and even literature is just beat of violent elements. The problem of media emphasis is not going away, foc using on the culture of delirium, whether this is a normal part of our sp obligationliness, or its what causes more belligerence in our society.During the day population spend a herd of term in the internet, near the TV screens, playing video games, so the consequent of this on people is evident mass media really has a neat influence on us. Every day on TV we chance images of furiousness death, injury, pain, sufferings, misery, wars and conflicts it is just impossible to name everything. Daily news shows us wars and conflicts from all over the macrocosm. Films, both for adults and children, also be full of de lirium fighting, murders, abuse and so on. Even books and magazines doesnt stay apart, the aforementioned(prenominal) situation is with the internet.That is why so many people, like scientists and just ordinary people who be not indifferent, raise the question if media strength affect people behavior and can cause the increase of violence in real- flavor?There ar 2 points of view some people blame media for too a great deal violence and want to censor violent content to encourage people, and especially children from its influence. Another people judge that mass media just reflects the real life as it is, and that doesnt cause violence in society.Another important font of this problem is the influence of violence in media on children, as children are very sensitive and very susceptible to this violence. Now, when children have an unlimited approach shot to various forms of media, there is a great concern for how they perceive and think about the violence they see, read or hear.Some experts, like prof L. Rowell Huesmann from the University of Michigan, argue that exposure to media violence causes children to behave more offensively and affects them as adults years later. Others, like Jonathan Freedman from the University of Toronto says that the scientific evidence simply does not show that watching violence either produces violence in people, or desensitizes them to it. (L. R. Huesmann, Laramie D Taylor)During the last 50 years there were a dowry of special researches concerning the influence of media on children. They show that American children amongst 6 and 18 years of age spend from 2 to 6 hours distributively day using different kinds of media television, video, movies, video games, radio, music, computer and the Internet. (James Steyer) This is more sequence than they spend on any other activity, so most of the teaching they perceive during the day is from mass media. A large proportion of this media acts of violence in different forms. It has been estimated that by age 18, the average young psyche will have viewed 200 000 acts of violence on television alone. (L. R. Huesmann, Laramie D Taylor)Prolonged access to such media shows results in increased acceptance of violence as an portion means of solving problems and achieving ones goals, and that television, movies, and music videos normalize using weapons and show them as a source of someoneal power. (J. L.Freedman). Research has associated violence in media with a variety of physical and mental health problems with children and adults aggressive behavior, desensitization to violence, fear, depression, nightmares and sleep disturbances. More than 3500 research studies have examined the connection between media violence and violent behavior, and practically 80% of them showed a real connection. (L. R. Huesmann, Laramie D Taylor)So should children be exposed to the media because of violence? And how can we protect children from violence showed in the media? Shoul d the violence in media be censored or left over(p) bighearted?THE PROSA lot of journalists speak about the protection of the right to free speech. Joanne Cantor argues Censorship is not the answer, but the right to free speech is aggressively used to protect commercial interests at the same time that the free speech rights of child advocates are stifled. (Joanne Cantor, 2002)The American Booksellers earthing for Free Expression lists a number of reasons to protect media violence as a form of free expressioncensorship isnt likely to go the problems of violence in societydecision about what is acceptable or not is always a subjective opinioneach person can choose what to see or to hear, can choose the appropriate for him variant of media informationa lot of books and films with elements of violence existed in the yesteryear and now are considered to be a goodness classics.A lot of free expression defenders say that that mass media is only one of a number of variables that effect people behavior. Psychologist Melanie Moore says Fear, greed, power-hunger, rage these are aspects that we try not to experience in our lives but often want, even need, to experience vicariously through stories of others. Children need violent entertainment in order to seek the inescapable feelings that theyve been taught to deny, and to reintegrate those feelings into a more whole, more complex, more alive(p) selfhood. (J. Steyer)Another people say that violence in media is only a method of artistic expression and a mean of showing the life as it is.Researchers R. Hodge and D. Tripp, for example, argue that Media violence is qualitatively different from real violence it is a natural signifier of conflict and difference, and without re establishations of conflict, art of the past and present would be seriously impoverished. (D. Grossman, G. Degaetano)THE CONTRASBut still most people nurse that today we have too much violence in the mass media. It cant help influencing us anyway, because at list it makes us sympathize that the life is not so good as we want and that the world around us is just so cruel. Violence in media makes people feel disappointed and not optimistic.Television, movies, and video games are full of acts of violence , deaths, crimes. When a child sees a violent act, he thinks it a game and may try to react it in real life. According to modern research at the University of Wake Forest, which results are presented at the conference academy of Pediatrics, the frequency of viewing violence on television is directly link up to the number of fights and other forms of destructive behavior. The results of this study are consistent with preceding(prenominal) numerous studies of Dr. Durante, who found a significant correlation between the violence depicted and the real violence among children and adolescents.Even if some people dont deal in the results of research, in my opinion even the risk of that violence in media and real life aggression a re connected is enough to exchange public and government to take necessary actions, as this question is a public issue. And so the state and public organizations intervention is of great splendour as concerns the censorship.Anyway media constructs reality, and influences our views on race, gender, politics, and body image, in not good way of course.ConclusionIn my view, today, it seems appropriate to conduct new studies that shew the influence of violence on human psyche, especially on children and adolescents, fetching into account the impacts of all the kinds of media. These findings should be communicated to the public in order to protect the younger generation of excessive and unjustified demonstrations of cruelty. In this regard, so relevant is the question raised by Plato in the IV century BC How can we so easily assume that children are listened to and perceived the individual of what horrible myths invented by just anyone and for the most part contrary to the truths tha t are we believe should be with them when they grow up? .